The Well Spoken Negro's Salon

Trying to Envision Solutions

2012-01-25T14:21:00.000-08:00

Those who've read this blog know that I LOVE cities. I love the energy, the noise, the conveniences, and even some of the grit (though not too much). I love that more cities are seeing more investment and growth in their historic and commercial cores. I particularly 24/7 cities, where there is always some solid amount of activity anytime one ventures out.

I was fascinated by an article in Slate that I read regarding Detroit, a city that has experienced incredible decline in the last several decades. With the re-emergence of the American auto industry, people have been talking up "Detroit," but this article focused on a documentary that posits whether or not the real Detroit is a harbinger of things to come for the U.S., as we adjust to the new realities of the global marketplace.

As I watched the video clip (which I will include below), I was reminded of the things I saw when I traveled to New Orleans following the Katrina related flooding. It's clear that Detroit, like New Orleans, needs some real comprehensive city planning. Perhaps, Detroit could become a re-imagined city with a smaller footprint. I think that it can be a great potential laboratory, and jobs could be created in a variety of areas as those experiments are tried and tested. Perhaps Detroit needs a well managed overhauling, and one that the people of the city supports, as did the auto companies that have made such a comeback.

A Belated Happy New Year

2012-01-25T14:02:00.000-08:00

Once again, I am glad to see the back of another rather tough year, and my usual optimism about the possibilities in this new year has returned. I have to admit that I've been surprised by my neglect, if you will, of my blog, and I definitely thought hard of just copying my old posts and shutting things down. But that's not happening today, and that's because a couple of long time readers have been nudging me not to close shop. That nudging reminded me that I'd not taken many opportunities to say "thank you" to the small community that has read my random thoughts and perspectives over the years. I appreciate you more than you know (including those with whom I disagree).

In Memorium

2011-12-16T06:34:00.000-08:00

It always amazes me how difficult it can be for me to write when I am sad about something. This week, two people who've influence my life passed away.

The first person, Dr. Valerie French, was a professor of ancient Mediterranean history, and simply one of the nicest and most caring individuals I've ever met. She convinced me to take a chance at teaching an introductory history course with her, even though she knew that I was hesitant to teach in the classroom (I wanted to focus on public history). I am glad she convinced me to teach, because the experience helped me to discover the natural teacher within. Dr. French was a fierce advocate for students, undergraduate or graduate. I am so glad that I had an opportunity to know her, work with her, and learn from her (the art of teaching).

The second person, Christopher Hitchens, was a writer who wrote for Vanity Fair and Slate, to name a few places. And because Washington can sometimes seem very small, I occasionally would see Hitchens out and about in the city. I always read his column first, when my Vanity Fair arrived. I loved that he simply would not suffer fools, and used his pen like a weapon when roused. I often wondered what he would have been like as a Rhetoric professor, though I am sure he would have been brutal (and likely be considered the professor who really taught people both how to think and write). I will miss reading his commentary, and in a way, I wish that he could give us just one final essay, now that he really knows what's awaits us upon death.

UPDATE: 12.18.11
I wanted to add an important update to my comment regarding Christopher Hitchens. As I read Glenn Greenwald's comment on Hitchens' death, I am glad that he reminded me of the things, the many things, that Hitchens wrote that I disagreed with fundamentally, particularly regarding the lead-up to, and execution of the Iraq War by the Bush administration. I will admit that I agree fully with Greenwald's point about Hitchens' increasingly disturbing (to me) views throughout that conflict. I was also reminded of something that I promised myself I wouldn't do: put too much faith in an individual in the world of politics. I'm still learning my lesson. Please check out Greenwald's post. It is well worth the read.

Sometimes One Has to Laugh, in Order to Keep Calm

2011-12-14T16:29:00.000-08:00

Regarding the current GOP front runner (as I predicted pending the fall of Cain), I think that Larry Wilmore from "The Daily Show" nicely translates one of Newt's "big ideas.

The Daily Show
Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

Coates Just Broke It Down

2011-12-08T17:16:00.000-08:00

All I want folks to do is read this post from Ta-Nehisi Coates, regarding Rick Perry's painfully bigoted, and factually suspect political ad. It's spot on, in my opinion.

It's Been a While...

2011-12-06T17:13:00.000-08:00

...since my last post. I have to admit that I've really been focusing more on things at home, than the things going on in the world (not that I haven't been paying some attention). But with a grandmother in the final stages of Alzheimer's, I simply needed to focus my energy away from here. Also, I am still dealing with my own little diabetes issue (I really need to exercise more, since I think I have the modified diet down), as well as the continual hunt for consulting/speaking opportunities (I did speak to a group of architecture students at an HBCU back in October, and I will be doing a small project for Black History Month for a very small DC group, so it's not too, too bad). My point is that I will be posting again soon. I actually miss it. And in the spirit of the season, I've a couple of tunes I highly recommend. Enjoy!

The Vince Gauraldi Trio, "Skating"

The Vince Gauraldi Trio, "Christmas Time is Here"

There's So Much That Could be Said...(II)

2011-11-14T19:00:00.000-08:00

...about Herman Cain, and I had no idea that when I wrote that Nov. 3 post that Cain would self-destruct in such a devastating fashion. I still stand by my original point that I was glad to see a Cain candidacy in the GOP. But, there is no question that Cain is simply not ready, and if any of the sexual harassment/assault allegations are true, then that should be a real deal breaker for his current supporters (the allegations seem to have led some to abandon Cain already). Actually, I think Cain has been presenting a nice stream of deal breakers under normal circumstances, but I have to remind myself that he is running for the GOP nomination, so those rules don't really apply (if they did, then Jon Huntsman would be a serious threat to Mitt Romney).

But this little bit of video is actually tough to watch.

Though, I suppose one could apply the "wisdom" he put forth regarding the OWS movement: If are running for President, having little knowledge of U.S. foreign policy, and you haven't boned up on the subject before going to a debate or an interview, then you should "blame yourself."

"Tortue or Not Torture?": That Is (and Has Been) the Question

2011-11-14T12:44:00.000-08:00

As I watched Saturday's debate, I was completely unsurprised that the majority of those on the stage are totally for torture (in their speak, "enhanced interrogation"). I knew already that Ron Paul was against the torture committed in our name, but I admit to being quite surprised that Jon Huntsman agreed with Paul. Meanwhile, Romney will likely change his position, when his current position proves inconvenient.

Of course, President Obama made it clear that he considered waterboarding torture (though I think this post from Glenn Greenwald on other troubling aspects of the Bush Administration's foreign policy ideas continued under the current administration is well worth a read). And though I am glad to hear John McCain reiterate his position that waterboarding is torture, I wish he'd been more forceful in stating his position during the Bush administration.

Considering these differences of opinion, I think there needs to be a real investigation into the ways that the Bush administration conducted the "war on terror," particularly with regard to detainees, and there should be a specific request to determine if the actions of the Bush administration, even with its legal memoranda on the subject, violated the Geneva Conventions. Clearly, there needs to be some sort of clarification, because there is no consensus on the subject. Sadly, I know that nothing like that will ever happen. It's probable that this will be resolved only by future historians, long after the deaths of the principals in question. That's a real shame.

My Thoughts on the Protests Heard 'Round the World II

2011-11-13T20:53:00.000-08:00

One of my online buddies, Brent Stafford (based in Vancouver, BC), has devised an interesting effort that he feels will help the Occupy Wall Street movement (OWS). "5thingsWeWant" suggest five issues that the OWS should present as demands that will provide clarity and greater focus for the movement as a whole.

I like the idea of OWS coalescing around a specific set of demands that can be agreed to across the board. As you saw in the clip Stafford's group offers five suggestions: abandon the filibuster in the Senate; reform the corporate tax code; a mortgage bailout; free college for the first two years; a Constitutional amendment defining that corporations are not "people."

After I heard Stafford's ideas, three thoughts came to my mind. First, I know that I would want to see a demand for criminal investigations (with real teeth) on what led to the crash of 2008, because that just didn't happen. Second, I would want to see a full reinstatement of the Glass-Steagall Act (updated for the 21st century, of course), which would break up "too big to fail" banks, as well as a tax on the transaction fees that investment banks charge. Finally, I thought that two of the suggested demands would likely go nowhere from the start: the mortgage bailout and the free college.

I think it is fair to say that essentially half of the American populace already believes that too many "undeserving" people get too much of a "free ride" for their "poor choices." So the idea that an already reviled, by many media folk, a third of the public, and a solid half of the political leadership in this country, OWS movement would demand a bailout for actual non-rich people, and another "handout" for the undeserving, is likely a bridge too far. With that said, I do agree that homeowners certainly need more help than they've received. I also agree that we need an educated populace, and that perhaps the free college for two years idea could be modified somehow to tie in our existing community college system (and reduce some rates instead).

Overall, I really like what Stafford and his folks have done. It is important for any movement to develop, over time, specific demands and spokesmen and women to speak on a movement's behalf. In that respect, the OWS can learn from the rise of the Tea Party Republicans (though I hope OWS continues to remain politically independent). Stafford's suggestions, I think, really should be examined by OWS, and even if it doesn't endorse all of the suggestions, it does provide good advice and a real potential road map that could benefit OWS as winter approaches.

Enjoying Getting "Up w/ Chris Hayes" on the Weekends

2011-11-13T19:55:00.000-08:00

I've become a huge fan of the new MSNBC show "Up w/ Chris Hayes." It is one of the best political programs I've seen in a very long time, and the format is excellent. Hayes has a standing group of 4 guests for the entire program, with occasional additions (where one of the four leaves for a segment). This format offers the guest a great deal of time for actual conversation and analysis, and so far, Hayes has been able to have ideological diversity among his groups of guests, though there is certainly a strong liberal leaning to the show overall. I highly recommend the show.

I also wanted specifically to highlight this editorial that Hayes put together on "generational warfare." I liked it so much that I've included the clip. I found the editorial well reasoned, and I nodded my head in agreement often, as Hayes made his various points.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

When I think about the arguments surrounding the efforts to privatize Social Security (I can't recall how many of my actual peers parrot the line that "we won't see any of that money anyway," usually ending their point with a nod to the magic of Wall Street and/or individual responsibility), or the standing House budget bill eliminating Medicare and Medicaid as we know them, it seems very clear that there is a real effort to make sure that Generation X, and the others that follow, will not have the benefits that our parents or grandparents are currently or soon-to-be receiving. And that effort is not really being waged for the benefit of the younger generations; it seems to me to be yet another scheme to funnel more money to Wall Street and insurance companies, while simultaneously leaving all of us at the mercy of the marketplace (I should add that Mitt Romney appears to be floating the idea of privatizing veterans' benefits as well).

I thank Hayes for getting me to think about that issue (and many others) on my weekend mornings (it's hard out here for a political junkie), and strongly recommend readers of this blog, regardless of political perspective, to tune in.

Thanks for the Good Times, Heavy D

2011-11-08T18:50:00.000-08:00

I was really sorry to hear about the passing of Dwight Myers, better known to hip hop fans as Heavy D. I always feel a bit uncomfortable when someone near my age passes away, and Heavy D was only 44. Rod 2.0 has a very nice write up of Heavy D, that folks should check out. Heavy D is the second musician I really liked during my younger days who has passed away in recent weeks (Vesta Williams is the other musician who passed away). I want to thank Heavy D for bringing his brand to the rap game, and he represented for the big boys in the world (and he could dance with the best of them). Whether he was getting folks on the floor to join the party, or rapping about the desire for love, Heavy D (and his Boyz) definitely made his mark as hip hop rose to prominence. I want to thank him for the music he made, and may he rest in peace.

There's So Much That Could be Said...

2011-11-03T18:23:00.000-07:00

...about Herman Cain, but I think he is doing fine allllll by himself. I guess the next runner-up is ready for his close up (Newt), so you might want to close out that latest Tiffany's account.

If This Ain't a Waste of Time

2011-11-01T18:06:00.000-07:00

Why in Jesus' name is the U.S. House voting on ensuring that the motto "In God We Trust" remains? Really? Really? I'm even more embarrassed that a Virginian is spearheading this madness.

Always Good to See the "Sanctity of Marriage" on Display...

2011-10-31T15:14:00.000-07:00

...after the last camera crew wrapped up from the wedding spectacle and 72 days have passed. Meanwhile, there remain tons of gay and lesbian couples who have been together for years, decades even, who constitute the real "threat" to marriage.

My Thoughts on the Protests Heard 'Round the World

2011-10-31T08:15:00.000-07:00

I will admit that I've waited on purpose to write anything about the "Occupy Wall Street" (OWS) movement. I was sure that comparisons of OWS and the Tea Party would be inevitable, and I knew that my own personal political perspective would align more readily with OWS. I was not surprised to see the reaction from folks on the Tea Party side, particularly its leaders, but have been hearing that some self proclaimed Tea Party supporters also support some aspects of OWS. I happen to like that OWS is taking its time to settle on anything specific, with regard to demands, because it affords the movement with an opportunity to embrace many different types of folks. I like that there is a diversity of issues that have brought people together to public squares throughout the country, and even around the world (I love that The Guardian has an entire section of its site dedicated to OWS. I pray that OWS does not become to the Democratic Party what the Tea Party has become to the Republican Party, because I believe that the issues that motivate folks to support OWS transcend tired party line constructs.

I certainly can explain why I support the concept of OWS. It boils down to the fact that virtually no one who was responsible for the collapse of the American economy has been held to account. I still think about the film "Inside Job," and I get angry. I still think about the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission's report, and how it remains a far cry from the old Pecora Commission efforts following the Crash of 1929. I still think that the Dodd-Frank law didn't go far enough, and was weakened by financial industry lobbyists. I still think about Joseph Stiglitz's brilliant essay, "Of the 1%, by the 1%, and for the 1%," in Vanity Fair.

In essence, I find that the lack of a real effort on the part of our government to make sure that something like what happened in 2008 never happens again to be appalling, and I also find it outrageous that so many in the upper echelons of Wall Street have been let off of the hook. Sadly, I have little expectation that anything substantive really will be done to right that massive multi-trillion dollar wrong. And I cannot help but laugh at the notion that calling for actual justice for destroying the American economy and the net worth of millions of Americans is derisively dismissed as "class warfare."

On Libya VI

2011-10-20T17:59:00.000-07:00

I just read through all of my previous posts regarding Libya. I was reminded of my genuine sense of uncertainty and rising anger with getting our country involved, and I'm cool with that.  I wondered what our actual interests were. I wondered how we would pay for it.  And I wondered if President Obama was really doing the right thing. Well, in light of the report that Qaddafi was killed today, it's clear that Obama did, in fact, do the right thing (and I am so glad that Lady Luck was also on our, and the rebels,' side on this).

Of course, there will continue to be legitimate procedural questions (with Congress) regarding the manner in which we became involved with Libya, questions that deserve answers. Yet, I think there is an argument that Obama's tactic of "leading from behind" was a very conservative, in the traditional sense, approach. First, he made sure that all of the necessary actors are on board with U.S. intervention, particularly the Libyan rebels, the UN, and the Arab League, making sure all of those bases were covered. Second, he shifted oversight, following the initial air strikes, to NATO, with the UK and France providing solid support to the rebels who called for help. Third, he made sure that no American boots hit the ground on this. Finally, he made it clear that the entire operation was simply support for the rebel forces, thus letting the rebel forces continue with their challenge of Qaddafi. The result, as we now know, was the fall of Qaddafi primarily at the hands of Libyan rebels.  This seems to me to be an inherently conservative approach. This approach actually helped the Libyan rebels to help themselves, and though we share in the victory of Qaddafi's fall, this, essentially was a Libyan victory. We led from behind, and helped to empower agents of change.

That all of this could have gone wrong is obvious. The same can be said of Obama's call to go after Osama bin Laden. That action could have gone horribly wrong, but it didn't.  I am much more confident about President Obama's judgment on some of his foreign policy, than I was as this action began. And I will continue to criticize, as I have done. But, I just wanted to offer my congratulations to all who made this work, and I hope that the people of Libya will benefit truly from this change.

On Elizabeth Warren II

2011-10-11T18:40:00.000-07:00

I make no bones about my appreciation for the work and tenacity of Elizabeth Warren. I was glad to hear that she decided to run for the U.S. Senate against Sen. Scott Brown, and what a stark contrast there is between the two of them. I think that should she prevail, she will be a great ally for the middle class. I truly wish her well in her effort to become a Senator.

I decided to write this post, because I just finished reading an excellent article about Warren over at Vanity Fair. What really struck me about the article was that it provided a rich context as to why Warren is absolutely reviled by many tied to Wall Street, including those in Washington and the Obama administration: she actually understands what Wall Street has been doing. Warren can call folks out by citing the very schemes and formulae that Wall Street "wizards" have created to bilk the American middle class, and enrich themselves. She also has American history on her side when it comes to potential remedies, remedies that helped to create the greatest middle class the world has ever known.

In many ways, I wish that Warren would run for the U.S. Senate as an independent. I think that her perspective on the American economy, and her forthright defense of the middle class is a great compliment to some of the reasons that have led to the "Occupy Wall Street" movement. And by running as an independent, I think that she would become one of the few politicians who could really speak for aspects of this burgeoning movement.

A Conservative Leader's Argument for Marriage Equality

2011-10-05T13:24:00.000-07:00

Of course, I am not talking about an American "conservative." This post is about the current Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and his strengthened support for marriage equality (h/t: Towleroad) in the UK. I don't expect a similar announcement from the leader of the United States.

Pretty Clear Why This Interview Didn't Air...

2011-10-04T05:37:00.000-07:00

...on a certain "news" network's prime time program, as the reporter promised.

You Keep Waiting for That Apology, Dick

2011-10-03T18:56:00.000-07:00

I was going to put forth a missive after hearing that Dick Cheney was seeking an apology from the Obama administration following the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki (find that I am somewhere between Glenn Greenwald and Andrew Sullivan on that topic), because that death somehow justified the tactics used by the Bush administration during the "war on terror." However, after reading Sullivan's smack down, I thought that it would be best if I just provided a link to what he had to say. And well done, Sen. McCain.

Is It Really "Just a Name?"

2011-10-03T16:34:00.000-07:00

I definitely am not surprised to see that the media was all a-twitter about Herman Cain's "insensitivity" charge against Gov. Rick Perry over the name of the parcel of land where Perry's family has hosted hunting parties for years. But I have to admit that I don't see this issue as necessarily problematic for Perry politically. I think it's simply a reminder of our country's long lived racial history. It will be interesting to see how Perry handles this.

I know that there will be a fair few who will accuse Perry of racism. I think it's a worthless accusation, and I just don't see Perry as a racist. However, I do find it interesting that no one in that county really seemed to make an effort to stop calling the hunting grounds "Niggerhead," and it seems that few had any real problem with the name to begin with (a local judge said that it was "...just a name....It's just what it was called). It reminds me of the portion of the Washington Post story on this issue where two Haskell County, TX residents offered very different perspectives on their experiences in the county. Mae Lou Yeldell recalled that "it was not uncommon in the 1950s and '60s for whites to greet blacks with 'Morning, Nigger." Meanwhile, Don Ballard recalled that there "[c]ertainly were no picketing signs. Blacks were perfectly satisfied with what was happening." And therein rests the problem. The perceptions and realities are simply different.

I am sure that there are many who will be disappointed in Cain for "playing the race card," as though Cain should understand that "Niggerhead" is "just a name." As I did research on African American historic places across the country, I was surprised by the number of places that bore the name "Nigger," like "Niggerhead." And though it may sound strange to some, I think that there is a value to the broader populace being made aware that places like "Niggerhead" existed and continue to exist (though certainly not with a great deal of public prominence). It would be interesting to see if Perry tackles this issue from the perspective of just the big rock announcing one's arrival in "Niggerhead," or if he will tackle the issue of how a name that charged could be brushed off as simply "just a name." Will Perry end up having to do a race speech like Obama (or religion speech like Romney)? It might be helpful for him to do something like that, and it potentially could help other Baby Boomer white Southern conservative politicians running for high office (remember Haley Barbour's Jim Crow era remembrance?).

I wanted to add that I really liked Ta-Nehisi Coates' perspective on this, and it prompted me to write this post. I also found Matt Yglesias' comment quite funny, and eerily accurate. Please check them out.

Time to Move My Money

2011-10-01T06:48:00.000-07:00

Yep, my jaw dropped when I saw that Bank of America (BoA) was going to start charging a monthly debit card fee. I've not really had a problem with BoA, like so many others I've heard, but I don't have any spare cash to be giving to my bank (on top of basic monthly fees) because I want to use my debit card. Having had accounts at two large banks (BoA and Wachovia), I have to admit that I missed the convenience and the service I received when I was with my old hometown bank. Sometimes, it is good to return home, and I will be moving my money next week.

About That "Big Tent" in the GOP

2011-09-27T22:08:00.000-07:00

I doubt that many would be surprised to hear that a Republican Muslim seeking a leadership position within his local party was treated like this. I guess that for some folks identifying oneself as a Muslim is a matter of being judged guilty just because.

I Agree with David Sirota

2011-09-26T18:07:00.000-07:00

I have a small introduction/anecdote that I want to share before I get to the Sirota comment, and it is actually relevant to the overall post.

One of my best friends, who is from my hometown, and her husband were in town for their annual U.S. summer respite from their current home outside of Mexico City. Since we usually gather for drinks and conversation when they are in the country, I wanted to suggest this great little spot in Phoebus (in Hampton, VA) called Six (I highly recommend the Bombay gimlet up). My friend spent more than a decade in New York City, and I'd spent more than a decade in Washington, DC, and Six is the first place I've come across locally that had a vibe we both recognized and sorely missed. And it was at Six where the discussion that has led to this post took place.

My friend's husband asked if I'd read an op-ed by The Nation Magazine's Melissa Harris-Perry (I am a fan) positing reasons for white liberal disenchantment with President Obama. I hadn't, so he gave me an assignment, and provided me with a one word summary: racism. I looked at him skeptically, because my gut instinct was that that can't be right.

It was only today that I remembered my assignment, because I saw David Sirota's rebuttal to Harris-Perry at Salon. Having now read both, I have to say that I really do agree with Sirota. I highly recommend reading both pieces, starting with Harris-Perry's. I will just say that Sirota brings in a great deal of empirical evidence, including the drop in popularity for President Obama within the black community, to bolster his points. Finally, I will add that my disenchantment with President Obama, and I've expressed that disenchantment in various posts on this blog, has nothing to do with racism. Sirota broke it down nicely.

I Wanted to Wait a Few Days Before Commenting...

2011-09-26T07:24:00.000-07:00

...about the heckling and boos the gay soldier received from some members of the GOP debate audience. I think that if one wanted to know how reviled the gay community is in some circles of the GOP, then this was a perfect example. After a decade of hearing folks on the right nearly fetish-ize "supporting the troops," not a single person on that stage offered to support that soldier currently serving in Iraq, nor did a single person on that stage (or among the moderators) chide the audience for their reaction. As a matter of fact, Santorum had the gall to call this man's service "tragic" and a "social experiment." The only saving grace I can take from this situation is that at least the younger Republicans understand the humanity of their gay peers, and support issues like gay marriage and the repeal of DADT. Meanwhile, I can only imagine what went through that soldier's mind once he heard those many boos coming from the audience. Finally, I hope this helps gay Republicans to see why it is difficult for the vast majority of the GLBT community to support GOP candidates, even when the occasional candidate has interesting ideas. And it should serve as a reminder of precisely how precarious their standing within the GOP tent really is (and don't take this as some ringing endorsement of the Democratic party; it isn't, but credit is given when credit is due).

Didn't See That Coming at All

2011-09-26T07:01:00.000-07:00

Following the second Republican debate, I'd concluded that this race was Gov. Rick Perry's to lose. Well, with Herman Cain, Herman Cain, winning the Florida straw poll vote, coupled with the panning across the conservative punditry of Perry's performance in that third debate in Florida, Perry seems to be on a quick path to obscurity, if he doesn't sort out a way to right his ship. Meanwhile, I do find it hilarious that Perry's Achilles' heels appear to be his effort to battle cervical cancer, and his effort to help out the children of illegal immigrants through the Texas version of the Dream Act, two programs that I think have been useful in Texas.

"You Know It's Hard Out Here for a Member of Congress?" II

2011-09-20T08:53:00.000-07:00

Sometimes you just cannot make these things up (Rep. John Fleming). I don't think that a person who says that it takes $200,000 to "feed his family" is going to get much sympathy from the vast majority of Americans who will never see anything close to the $600,000 (and that does not include his salary as a Member of Congress) net personal income he enjoys. Actually, now that I think of it, perhaps he could get his family to eat on his congressional salary, and then he can use the full $600,000 for the re-investments, and all of the other things he's said that he is pressed to pay for with those paltry earnings.

A Sad Chapter Finally Finished

2011-09-19T21:01:00.000-07:00

Right now, I wish I was in Washington, DC out and about in Logan, and preparing to raise gin gimlet filled glass to the formal ending of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" with gay, lesbian and bisexual friends (and one cousin) who served, and serve, in the military. I am also extremely happy for all of those currently serving in silence (or semi-silence), because they finally can breathe a sigh of relief and simply live their lives without the threat of losing their careers. I doubt that the transition will be problem free, but I am sure that with time, as has been shown in foreign military organizations, "gays in the military" will not induce shock or derision. I'm sure Leonard Matlovich is smiling, wherever he is.

UPDATE 9.20.11: I just saw that one of the co-founders (h/t Towleroad) of the group OutServe has decided to come out publicly. OutServe is an organization of active serving military personnel.

Hip Hop Remembrances: Groove Theory

2011-09-19T20:35:00.000-07:00

When it comes to music, there are times when you hear the opening beats of a song, and you just know that you will love a song. That was precisely how I felt in 1995 the first time I heard "Tell Me" by Groove Theory, head bobbing to those Bryce Wilson beats almost instinctively. And then there is Amel Larrieux's voice; enough said. I knew that I had to have the CD, and the eponymous titled album continues to be one of my all-time favorites. Listening to Groove Theory tracks just reminded me of how cool and smooth the group's sound was, and continues to be.

I was sad when I learned that there would only be the one Groove Theory album, but I definitely have enjoyed the solo work of Larrieux over the years. And I can hope that one day, Wilson and Larrieux might come together on stage again.

All About Their Benjamins II

2011-09-19T14:08:00.000-07:00

During one of the recent Republican candidate debates, one of the candidates intimated that the legislation passed during the New Deal might not have been as beneficial for the country as we've come to believe. Of course I disagree with that sentiment, and one particular bit of legislation that came about in the New Deal era is in dire need of being reinstated (with 21st century updates): the Glass-Steagall Act (the Banking Act of 1933). Glass-Steagall was repealed with two new bits of legislation. The first was the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980, and the second was the Federal Services Modernization Act of 1999, better known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.

I give Matt Taibbi credit for reminding me about the Glass-Steagall Act, as I read his blog post regarding the little situation with the UBS trader's $2 billion dollar bad deal. In the post Taibbi mentions the UK's consideration of "ring fencing," which is akin to what Glass-Steagall did in separating commercial and investment banks in the U.S, something that provided a great deal of stability for the U.S. economy for decades. It will be interesting to see if the UK does decide to implement "ring fencing," even in the face of calls of the possibility of an economic slowdown.

Taibbi's post also reminded me of why I was skeptical of potential effectiveness of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The one thing I liked about the law was the creation of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, but I remained disappointed in the lack of actual teeth in the law, as I mentioned in a previous post. And all of this is an extension of my continued disappointment in the Obama administration's economic team, and the sense that it was more concerned about Wall Street (which now hates the President), than it was about Main Street.

Tough to Defend

2011-09-16T07:54:00.000-07:00

The Daily Show
Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

The Best Word I Can Muster for Tonight is "Interesting"

2011-09-12T19:19:00.000-07:00

I just finished watching the latest GOP debate. Um, I am not really sure what to say. Wait, interestingly, I felt that some of what Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman said actually made some sense. And Rick Perry was getting all sorts of love, until those friggin' Latinos came up in the discussion. And who could not help but get a warm fuzzy for the audience member all for the uninsured dude of Blitzer's question dying for lack of sufficient health insurance.

Bachmann, for all of her "chootzpah," was giving Lipton, when most of the people in that room had a taste for that Luzianne flavor, drawl and all. This is now Perry's to lose.

Oh, I found this and this to be interesting reading over at "The Dish." Enjoy.

Actual "Fraud, Waste and Abuse," and Likely Nothing Will be Done II

2011-09-09T15:17:00.000-07:00

Isn't it amazing what some actual accounting and auditing can reveal? As I noted in my post on the utter waste of expenditures in the Defense Department, waste that the GOP virtually ignores (it helps when people like former VPOTUS Cheney and his "job creator" cronies own those very same wasteful defense contracting businesses), and centrist and conservative Democrats are often too afraid to call out, I am often shocked at how badly things were done following the attacks on September 11, 2001. Over at the Huffington Post, Dan Froomkin has reported on the outrageously wasteful, abusive and fraudulent spending out of the Department of Homeland Security. From what I can tell, the outrage from the right has been rather muted. Shocking, I know.

Honestly, no one should be surprised that the largest bureaucracy ever created by the federal government, created under a Republican controlled government, turned out to be both terribly wasteful for the taxpayers, and incredibly lucrative for contractors. Therein rests the only actual benefit of government for far too many on the right: a means to transfer taxpayer dollars to the so called "job creators." Let's not forget that it was the current House Banking Committee Chair who declared publicly that "Washington and regulators are there to serve the banks." With that mentality, coupled with an open disdain for government generally, it becomes clear that "waste, fraud and abuse" will be endemic; it will also provide the ancillary benefit of a great GOP talking point regarding the "evils" of government.

And About Tonight

2011-09-08T08:16:00.000-07:00

If President Obama proposed a resolution declaring water to be wet, the GOP members on the Hill would not pass it. With that in mind, it doesn't matter what the President will propose tonight. I doubt seriously that it will pass. How difficult is it to understand that the GOP has absofuckinglutely no intention of passing anything that will help this country, if there is an ancillary benefit politically to the President.

Oh, and while I am on the subject, check out this bit of commentary from a former GOP Hill staffer, Mike Lofgren. I am sure there will be some conspiracy theories about how Lofgren isn't "really" a Republican (because no Republican can ever actually disagree with Republican policy ideas, and still claim to be a Republican, right?), but I think he establishes his credentials just fine. What Lofgren says fits perfectly with what we are seeing play out in Washington (here's some Matt Taibbi to add further analysis to Lofgren's points).

So, I will watch the speech tonight. I wonder who will scream out at the President this time around. Maybe it will be more than one person, and more money will be raised for them for "standing up to the President," again.

About Last Night

2011-09-08T08:02:00.000-07:00

From what I could tell as last night's GOP debate came to a conclusion, it seemed clear to me that this has now become a race between the two similar looking Republicans, Mitt Romney and Rick Perry. Mind you, I think either would be an absolute disaster for everyone except the wealthiest Americans, and maybe those in the military (though our perpetual war machine needs to end; just can't afford it). Meanwhile, I have to admit that I was surprised by some of what Jon Huntsman was saying. Again, he is a bridge too far for me to consider casting a vote, but I could at least see the damn bridge from which he was speaking.

I really do not understand how Mitt Romney is even doing well within this whole primary circuit. There is no question that he is a weathercock in the midst of a strong gale wind with regard to his positions on almost everything. And is there really anything worth saying about Bachmann, Cain, Gingrich, Paul or Santorum? Finally, I am sure that there was swooning and caught vapors all across GOP homes (though first for having to actually watch anything on MSNBC, but I digress) as Gov. Rick Perry spoke loud and said essentially nothing.

Unless there is some gay scandal that we don't know about, I am already guessing that the contest in '12 will be Obama v. Perry.

All I Can Say Is...

2011-08-31T20:45:00.000-07:00

...read Frank Rich's latest article over at New York magazine on this upcoming 10th anniversary of September 11. It's well worth the click, and it was another reminder of how much I miss his column in the Sunday New York Times (the first thing I would read of the paper on Sundays).

Actual "Fraud, Waste and Abuse," and Likely Nothing Will be Done

2011-08-31T20:34:00.000-07:00

The Commission on Wartime Contracting has presented its final report, and (shockingly) the Commission found lots of "fraud, waste and abuse," three of the most popular (and empty) words thrown around Capitol Hill these days. I've only read some of the articles written about the report's finding, but color me far from surprised. There was no question in my mind that our dealings with defense contractors was outrageously expensive. And in the midst of the screaming about cutting discretionary spending, there seems to be a rather muted response to the Commission's report.

Where is the outrage from the right on this issue, this empirical evidence of "fraud, waste and abuse." It's possible that up to $60 billion dollars has been lost during the course of this war, and it's been cited in the report that more extensive oversight and regulation is needed in order to keep a reasonable accounting of how and where government money is spent with contractors. If I recall correctly, these are the very types of suggestions that have Republicans screaming about "job killing" pick any term. Yet, for all of this faux concern about combating "waste, fraud and abuse," I've zero confidence that they will muster even genuine interest in the findings in this report. Well, the example used in the press release cites an agricultural program that started in 2009, so naturally the right will dismiss everything between 2001 and 2008, and focus solely and singularly on anything that happened beginning January 2009. Remember that for this lot, the past doesn't matter, and private industry must never be regulated, only paid by government in some way, shape or form.

And lest folks think that I have only enmity for the GOP on this issue, think again. Democrats are supposed to be the party that believes in well run government, and this report shows that that was not happening with regard to taxpayer dollars while we were at war. Their lack of united outcry continues to leave open the perennial GOP charge of "government bad, unless it helps the private sector."

Hell, some of that lost money would be real handy right now, considering the aftermath of Hurricane Irene, and while Rep. Eric Cantor continues to show off his emperor's clothing, I am sure the last thing on his mind is considering looking for those "savings" in one area that has been shown to be hemorrhaging cash: defense contracting. After all, we don't want to upset those "job creators" with efforts at actual good governance and oversight. Heaven forbid.

Challenging a Perspective

2011-08-31T11:27:00.000-07:00

It has been interesting watching some of the comments and criticism about former VPOTUS Dick Cheney's memoir In My Time. Anyone who's read this blog knows without a doubt that I think that the former administration, at the very least, needs to be investigated thoroughly for the decisions that came from the White House. Though some friends, on various points of the political spectrum, disagree with me, I still believe that we lost the moral high ground as the Bush administration waged the "War on Terror," and that we compromised some of our basic American principles. I firmly support the position presented by Salon's Glenn Greenwald on the specific issue related to Cheney's media blitz (and I doubt highly that he will be leaving our shores to hawk his book anytime soon).

I've been watching different interviews from folks like Gen. Colin Powell, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson and former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, and unless Cheney and his supporters are willing to call all of them straight up liars to their faces, then I think that their perspectives on the issues Cheney raises about them, in his book, should be heard and investigated. After seeing many of these interviews, I think that there is even more of a reason to do a full investigation on the issues of authorizing torture, and how we went into and conducted the Iraq War.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

UPDATE: I just finished reading an article from Dahlia Lithwick over at Slate. That's some powerful writing. Lithwick also makes reference to an article written by Zev Chafets over at The Daily Beast, as well as one written by Conor Friedersdorf critiquing the Chafets' piece. And here is a related post from Greenwald regarding former government officials trying to tell their stories regarding torture, and being thwarted by the government from doing so directly.

Man, You Really Didn't Have to Go There

2011-08-31T10:48:00.000-07:00

Sometimes, I just have to shake my head. Rep. Carson, there is no need to add that kind of fuel to an already unnecessary burning fire, especially when you know your political opponents will have a field day with it. One day, and likely a day too late, folks will realize that all of this shit has more to do with class warfare from the top down than anything other "ism" out there.

Adolescent Music Flashback: Robert Palmer

2011-08-31T07:28:00.000-07:00

I think it was through MTV, way back at its beginning, that I'd first heard of Robert Palmer, and it was the song "Looking for Clues." It was his looks and attractively awkward dance movements that caught my attention, but I really liked what I heard in that song. The next time I noticed Palmer was in his cover of "You Are In My System," an incredible song. His collaboration with members from Duran Duran and Chic, in the form of Power Station, just blew me away, and that group will get its own blog post in the future.

After all of that goodness, Palmer had nerve enough to push it even further. I sat in front of my television, with my mouth on the floor, as I watched the video for "Addicted to Love." The immediate follow-up to that was a cover of Cherrelle's R&B hit "I Didn't Mean to Turn You On," which had the same general video concept as "Addicted to Love," but improved.

Though Palmer had continued success well after these songs left the charts, I am sticking to the aspect of his career that was during my adolescence. Though, I will add that it was a pleasant surprise to Beyonce pay homage to Palmer's video style with portions of her video for the song "Green Light."

It really was a shock to hear about Palmer's sudden death in 2003. He was a great talent indeed.

Adolescent Music Flashback: Alexander O'Neal

2011-08-31T06:21:00.000-07:00

Not too long ago, I watched the TV One show "Unsung" on Alexander O'Neal and Cherelle, and it brought back so many memories. Now I was never a big fan of the crooners when it came to R&B, but Alexander O'Neal was just plain cool. And what adolescent doesn't want to be cool at some point.

I, like many people, became familiar with O'Neal through his collaboration with Cherelle, "Saturday Love" (if you know the song, you can't help but go through those days of the week). I didn't know that O'Neal had an eponymously titled album in 1985, but I certainly became well aware of his second album "Hearsay." It is an incredible album, with little vignettes in between some of the songs, and just a strong host of Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis R&B tunes. Check out some of the clips from below, and I bet it will be hard not tap a foot or bob your head to the beats.

I think I perfected "the Prep" and "the Cabbage Patch" while listening to "Fake." For those who are interested, there is an Alexander O'Neal fan blog. Enjoy!

Regarding One Aspect of American Diversity

2011-08-30T17:17:00.000-07:00

I've certainly made it clear that I am no fan of the vast majority of policies advocated by today's conservatives, and I have my share of issues with some liberal policies as well. I've belonged to both political parties, and have voted for people in both over the years. I've also made it clear that I am not a fan of extremists in any faith, but am more than comfortable with people of faith. The same is true with non-believers as well. I have actual friends across the sexual orientation, racial and ethnic and political spectrum, and I know that my life has been enriched by them, even when we disagree. Our country is pluralistic, and out of many, one. Though some may argue otherwise, I think our diversity is a strength, and there is a reason why there is likely someone from every country on Earth who lives in the United States.

I was asked by a representative of My Fellow American to write a post highlighting that organization's effort to remind Americans that there are Muslims among us, and that they too love this country like any other American. In a recent post, I gave credit to Republican governor Chris Christie for his full-throated support of his judicial nominee, who is a practicing Muslim. Christie's comments could be repeated for hundreds of thousands of Americans who are Muslim. And that is what helped me to decide to write this post.

I know people who will view this post with eyebrows raised, and that's alright (and I would be shocked if one reader in particular didn't comment). Check out My Fellow American for yourself. There's an interesting little video there too.

Batteries Not Included

2011-08-29T13:08:00.000-07:00

Thankfully, my family fared well during Hurricane Irene. We lost power here in Hampton Roads (it's only just come back on after about 36 hours), my family in Richmond lost their power early Saturday, and it was hit or miss with my family in the DC region. A large tree missed my aunt's home by about one foot. And I found myself thinking about how our fore bearers existed in the time before electricity was commonplace (I got a lot of reading done). But one thing that really struck me during our lack of power was how the most reliable appliances in our house were the battery operated radios and battery operated lanterns.

Now, we have various other gadgets that should come in handy, but we noticed that many of them, though battery operated, required charging by electricity. Naturally, when the power goes out, that means that whatever gadget you have is only good for the length of the battery. So, I was limited to two hours on my computer, and about three hours for the television that provided important information and coverage of the storm. But once the batteries in those devices were expended, they were finished; they were no longer of any real use. Meanwhile, we pulled out the old school battery operated radios (one that we've had since the 1970s), and they worked beautifully.

That reality got me thinking. Perhaps those who design these great new gadgets that are meant to help us in our time of need could think about finding an alternative method for recharging batteries, especially in the case of power outages. Now, I have no idea about the intricacies of computer or portable television design, but I cannot imagine that it would be too difficult to come up with a way that those devices will not have to be solely dependent on electricity based rechargable batteries. Everyone likes innovation, but sometimes looking back at those so-called outdated devices can be a real help.

Decision Time Regarding Irene

2011-08-26T04:09:00.000-07:00

So here we are on the eve of Hurricane Irene's arrival, and my family is trying to sort out whether we stay in the area, or evacuate.

Get Me a Bromide, and Put Some Gin in It

2011-08-25T12:39:00.000-07:00

I can't be the only one who reads something and finds that I have an immediate headache. Right now, I am finding this whole situation with this attempt at a settlement with the banks regarding the claims of widespread mortgage and foreclosure fraud to be headache inducing. But it is also not surprising to me, because I think that all of this stems from President Obama's selection (and endorsement) of Tim Geithner, Larry Summers and their various cronies to handle Treasury policy. As a result of those selections, the administration's approach has been full throttle in favor of Wall Street, and an ignoring of the principal needs of Main Street (something that the GOP, regardless of the nominee, would only intensify).

Check out these posts from Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi. President Obama's handling of the folks on Wall Street has been as disappointing for me as his handling of the folks tied to our torture program (see this latest post from Greenwald about the pending media blitz from former VPOTUS Cheney). I cannot believe that we are even considering talking about settling with the big banks. That there hasn't been something akin to the Pecora Commission of the 1930s is a downright shame to me. The Dodd-Frank law pales in comparison to what was done during the Roosevelt administration, vis-a-vis Wall Street. Meanwhile people continue to lose their homes (and to my friends on the right, no, they all aren't these undeserving dreamers that fit neatly into a rightist diatribe), and the folks who sold them a bill of goods continue to chill on their ill gotten profits.

What's even more disappointing is that the general public seems completely uninterested.

There's So Much I Could Say...

2011-08-25T10:52:00.000-07:00

...but I will just say that at least Eric Cantor is consistent.

Keep Giving Rustin His Due

2011-08-24T14:33:00.000-07:00

In spite of the looming threat of Hurricane Irene bearing down on the mid-Atlantic, there are plenty of people still planning to descend upon Washington this weekend for the dedication of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial on the National Mall. Of course the weekend also marks the 48th anniversary of the 1963 March on Washington, and I was glad to see that the Washington Post decided to write an article about the actual organizer of the March, Bayard Rustin. And when I finished the article, I couldn't help but marvel at the fact that Rustin was an openly gay black man following his convictions both on racial equality and the right simply to be himself over 50 years ago. I agree with the assessment made in the article that we don't really know the name of Rustin, because he had the nerve to be a gay man not crippled by shame. I wish I had half of the amount of courage that Rustin displayed throughout his life.

An Earthquake is the Last Thing We Need

2011-08-23T11:23:00.000-07:00

Of course I just assumed that a rather large truck had passed by the house, but it's clear now that I've just experienced my first earthquake.

One of the Few I Would Ever Consider Supporting

2011-08-22T11:55:00.000-07:00

It was interesting to see that former Connecticut GOP Representative Chris Shays is considering a Senate run for retiring Sen. Joe Lieberman's old seat. Shays was always one of the few Republican that I thought I might consider voting for in the past. Though I still retain a vast skepticism regarding most GOP policies, I sensed a reasonableness in Shays that is missing from about 99% of the current GOP lot on the Hill. I wonder who his opponent will be.

Give the Man a Chance to be Heard

2011-08-19T12:03:00.000-07:00

Though I am sure that I will become straight before I vote for anyone currently in the GOP field, I think that GOP hopeful Fred Karger deserves to be treated as the legitimate candidate that he is. I also think that it is looking clearer that the treatment he has been experiencing is due to Karger being openly gay in a party that has many, many, many closets, but is uncomfortable (and often hostile) with its openly gay members. With that said, I am glad to see Karger push back on being shunted, and I will be interested in seeing how the FEC handles his complaint against Fox "News" for not allowing his participation in their last presidential debate. (h/t Towleroad)

I should add that there is one area where Karger and I agree: historic preservation. I had an opportunity to communicate with him a few years ago during his effort to save the Boom Boom Room, an historic gay night spot, at the old Coast Inn in Laguna Beach, CA. And though that battle ultimately was lost, I respected the effort that Karger and his allies put into the project. As I think about it, I believe Karger might be the only person in the hunt for the presidency with a demonstrated preservation background (someone let me know if I am wrong there).

The Coddling Must Stop?

2011-08-19T11:16:00.000-07:00

There are times when I just need a good solid laugh, and I have to say that Jon Stewart definitely got me laughing the other night. There's nothing better than a good crazy discussion on "class warfare," and being reminded by certain quarters that the poor in this country just have it a little too good.

Vacation Opportunity

2011-08-18T09:40:00.000-07:00

I really don't begrudge the fact that a President takes a vacation. Everyone needs at least a couple of days for themselves, and I would imagine with a job like "President of the United States," I definitely would want at least some time simply to process all that is happening around me. Of course, I am raising this as the criticisms roll in regarding President Obama's sojourn to Martha's Vineyard this week. But, I want to offer a suggestion. I think that it would be great, if any U.S. President decided to visit one of our national parks for a vacation. The Obamas have done it before, though without addressing the actual challenges the parks face. Not only would it put a national park in the spotlight, but it could be a great opportunity to talk about the deferred maintenance issues that the national parks suffer. Imagine the potential press as Obama talked about the threats faced by our parks, touted the need for repairs, and the jobs that could be created that would ensure the long term sustainability of the park itself.

Shocking News, Just Shocking

2011-08-18T08:22:00.000-07:00

Sometimes, I just have to shake my head at the things that appear to be "revelations" to folks in the political media. Helen Keller could have told folks all she heard and saw about the "Tea Party," when they first emerged. The rhetoric didn't fit the realities. And if we were to believe what got the tea party folks really riled up, then we should have heard about them between 2004 and 2009. We didn't.

So following the publication of an op-ed in the New York Times by two political scientists, we now have empirical evidence showing that the "Tea Party" is essentially a new brand for conservative Republican. I think I might have clutched my pearls as I read the op-ed. The vapors were beginning to take over.

Joan Walsh, over at Salon, has an enjoyable comment on this issue. Check it out and enjoy, while I collect myself after learning this news.

How About We Leave Harriet Out of This

2011-08-18T07:56:00.000-07:00

The last time I checked, the Republican Party is not some representation of "the Promised Land," so Rep. Allen West might want to check himself with his Harriet Tubman overreach. There is no question that the Democratic (it really isn't difficult to add the "i" and the "c") Party has its problems, but trust and believe, the Republican Party, in its current iteration, is not the answer.

Dreams of the Investor, and I Do Mean Dreams

2011-08-15T08:58:00.000-07:00

I am sure that there will be buzz around Warren Buffet's op-ed in the New York Times calling for our political leaders in Washington to increase taxes (both income and capital gains) on those at the very top of the income ladder, in an effort to ensure that there is a sense of shared sacrifice during this time of economic woe. I am also sure that the buzz will produce nothing remotely close to actual legislation. When you have a political party so completely determined in it's essentially religious belief that taxes never should be raised, under any circumstance, there is nothing anyone could say from Buffet's economic class that will ever get that lot to consider what he has said. And there are times when the cynic in me wonders if Buffet is comfortable saying these things now, because he knows that there is no way it will ever happen.

However, assuming that Buffet is being sincere, I find it fascinating that Republicans on the Hill, not exactly job creators themselves, will ignore out of hat Buffet's suggestions. I also find it fascinating that many supporters of the GOP who won't ever make even 1% of what Buffet earns in a year (those poor, working and middle class GOP supporters) will also dismiss Buffet's suggestions, and will cheer the GOP for doing so. I've never believed the line about "job creators" having "uncertainty" in the economy and on taxation. I long accepted that these "job creators" have every intention of assisting the GOP in re-taking the White House in '12, by ensuring that they not begin expanding or growing or hiring.

As far as I know, I do not have any family or close friends who net more than a million a year annually. I do have family and friends who are close to or just over that magical $250K line that everyone talks about as the income line for increased taxes. I wonder how many of them, regardless of political persuasion, agree with Buffet's suggestions, and if not, why not? How does it help our economy when Buffet's employees are taxed at a higher rate than he is? How does it help our economy when we ensure that those who don't even make a wage pay significantly less in overall taxes, because their earnings are all investment earnings?

Why am I even asking these questions? Nothing close to what Buffet has suggested will come to pass in the near future. Perhaps future generations will be able to look at these issues reasonably.

Not Remotely Shocked

2011-08-14T08:52:00.000-07:00

I'd always thought it was a foregone conclusion that Michele Bachmann would win the Iowa Straw Poll. She'd been polling well consistently for weeks, and she seems to exist in that odd bubble that only a select group on the right seem to understand, and believe to be true about the state of the nation. I am surprised that Tim Pawlenty is leaving the race so soon. But I suppose that after all of the work he put into Iowa, and then to come in a distant third was enough for him to say enough is enough. And I am as excited about Gov. Rick Perry entering the race for the presidency, as I am for the coming of summer.

News About as Welcome as an Extra Hot Summer Day

2011-08-10T09:33:00.000-07:00

Yay! We have news related to the "super" committee that is supposed to "work together" and create "workable solutions." Here are the picks for Sen. Harry Reid. And here are the picks for both Speaker Boehner and Sen. McConnell. Now we just need Rep. Pelosi's picks, and we'll be off. I wonder where will end up?

UPDATE 08.14.11: We now have a complete set for the "super" committee, with Rep. Pelosi's picks. Essentially, she added a little diversity to a small group of people who will get little done. I'm so excited.

Go On and Speak the Truth Sista

2011-08-10T07:30:00.000-07:00

I've been watching the coverage of the riots in the UK, and it's a shame to witness. I feel horrible for those who've lost their businesses, homes, and property, because it's senseless. Actually, take a look at the following clip (h/t The Dish). Sista broke it down, and she is definitely on point. Couldn't agree with her more.

This is a message to all who mistakenly think that rioting is a legitimate response to socio-economic or political frustrations.

Sometimes, the Truth Hurts

2011-08-07T10:06:00.000-07:00

I just finished reading Drew Westen's op-ed in today's New York Times, and I cannot recall feeling more uncomfortable as I reached a closing paragraph. Westen articulated beautifully the sentiment I felt on January 20, 2009, as I watched the Inauguration: I was left wanting at the end of President Obama's Inaugural Address. I fully recognized that we were in one of those rare historical moments at that point, and I am not talking about Obama being bi-racial. No, I recognized that Obama had an opportunity to re-shape a nation that was in dire need of significant and substantive change. And though I know that his term is not over, I feel that President Obama wasted that rare opportunity.

The historical examples that Westen elected to highlight, specifically the presidential legacies of the two Roosevelts, echo almost entirely my thoughts on what President Obama might have been capable of achieving. There was a fearlessness in both Roosevelts (imperfect men though they were), and their fearlessness, their confidence, and their passion was felt by millions of Americans. Our country benefited mightily from their time in office. They were unafraid to call out those who harmed broad American interests. Yet, as Westen points out in one example after another, Obama fails to provide that narrative to help all of us understand plainly his policy aims. There are too many times when he has "led from behind," when he needed to be wielding the proverbial "big stick" from his bully pulpit. And I am not saying that I wanted Obama to go out there with "scare all the white people" anger. Not even close. As Westen notes, no one seems to know where President Obama's passions lie (derisively some might say in capitulation).

Following the debt ceiling madness, and now the lowering of our credit rating by S&P, I wasn't sure how I wanted to approach my next blog post. Westen's op-ed has helped a great deal, because he provided a useful analysis of many of the thoughts coursing through my mind. Westen's will be one of those op-eds that will be read by many, many Obama supporters, and I bet many of them, if they are honest, will be as uncomfortable at the conclusion as I was.

UPDATE: I knew, without a doubt, that Andrew Sullivan would pounce on Westen's op-ed; it was just a matter of when (though the dismissive tone seems a bit much). I disagree with Sullivan's claim that Westen was seeking a "Democratic version of George W. Bush," because I don't see the former POTUS as a Republican version of FDR or LBJ. Nor do I think that the hopes of Obama supporters like Westen, or myself, were not reflective of the 21st century realities that we now face. I certainly called for a 21st century version of a CCC or WPA, with an emphasis on "a 21st century version. Just take a look.

A Sad Day In Afghanistan

2011-08-06T12:46:00.000-07:00

I think too many people in this country forget that we are in the midst of war, and that we have U.S. service men and women who are in harms way daily. Sadly, that fact was brought home with the news of the downing of a U.S. helicopter, where 38 people were killed, including 31 Americans. My thoughts are with their families and friends.

When I read these stories, I cannot help but think of the uncle I never had the chance to meet (he was killed in Vietnam, almost a year to the day before I was born), or my father and his Marine Corps friends, or my other relatives and friends who are (or were) veterans. I think of my friends currently serving, and I always hope that they remain far from harm's way.

But more than anything, news like today's tragic news reminds me of how much I want our troops home, with their missions behind them, and back with family and friends.

When Credit is Due

2011-08-05T12:45:00.000-07:00

I will begin by making it clear that there is little I share in common with New Jersey governor, Chris Christie, politically speaking. However, I have to give the man credit for making it clear that in his decision to appoint a practicing Muslim to a judgeship in New Jersey, he was appointing someone with excellent credentials for the job. Yet Christie deserves even more credit for calling out the madness of factions within his party who've decided that simply practicing Islam is tantamount to being a terrorist in waiting.

When the Usual Tactics Just Don"t Work

2011-08-04T11:00:00.000-07:00

There are times when it is important to show that one is the better person, that one will play the role of the adult and be the responsible one. Siblings go through this all of the time (think of your own relationships with your siblings, particularly if you are the oldest). Even in having to do these things on occasion, it's clear that it happens only on occasion. Generally, we all expect people to act like they have sense and just do what is necessary to achieve the goal.

Then there are those times when that shit simply doesn't work.

In yet another reminder as to why I am not a Democrat, I just finished reading an article from Greg Sargent, where the Hill Democrats are bemoaning the fact that Hill Republicans simply won't cooperate or be flexible. All I could do was shake my head and chuckle. The article was a big fat advertisement on why Democrats often get played, and end up looking like Boo Boo the Fool, when the day is done.

Republicans have been forthright in stating their goals and objectives, and they haven't relented. Hell, they used that clip from "The Town" to rally the troops. They keep telling us who they are, and Democrats refuse to listen. No one wants to support people who seem mired in cowardice. Why not try standing up to the bullies in your midst, instead of pleading for them to cooperate? Maybe, just maybe, if Democrats try that, then they might find that they have more support than it seems.

"How Ya Like Them Apples?"

2011-08-03T07:12:00.000-07:00

Matt Damon has been on a bit of a roll of late. I saw a post on Towleroad regarding his standing up for American teachers (and their ability actually to teach, as opposed to teach for a test). And, I've just finished reading his commentary (in a Huffington Post article) regarding the debt ceiling madness, and our economic policies. I fully appreciate, and often agree with, his political positions, and it's just nice to see someone deal effectively with reporters who ask stupid questions.

While watching this video clip again, I was reminded of how silly I think this notion that "government should be run like a business" is. governments aren't businesses. Though it is true that government should look into methods that improve efficiency and cost effectiveness, I don't recall there being a profit motivator for government (on the whole). Nor is there really an effort to insist on fairness, regulation and justice within businesses. Damon, I think, does a good job of explaining, in that short answer, the heart of that problematic thinking.

It's Amazing How Much Context a Sound Bite Misses II

2011-07-29T09:56:00.000-07:00

Back in May, I wrote a post about a new favorite thing that those on the right tout about "half of Americans" not paying federal income taxes. In that post, I mentioned that there are other taxes that we all pay in some way shape or form, and as I said then, it was of no avail. As this claim gained legs, it also started losing a couple of words, specifically "federal" and "income." Now, there are people claiming, with complete righteous indignation, that half of the country "doesn't pay taxes."

Over at The Dish, there is a post that simply asks "Who Pays Taxes?" I think it is well worth the read. More importantly, the post and the various embedded links within the post provide the necessary context to disprove some things (like the notion that half of us pay no taxes) and flesh out other things (like how people end up not paying those federal income taxes, and how it's not just the poor who don't pay).

Christianism Defined and Personified

2011-07-25T14:10:00.000-07:00

Following the terror acts in Norway, I wanted to see what Andrew Sullivan would have to say about the perpetrator. I was not disappointed. Please take a look at Sullivan's post. It also provides a definition of "Christianism," a term he coined, and one that I use frequently. And Sullivan argues that this Norwegian terrorist is a personification of a "Christianist," albeit one who decided that violence was the only way he could achieve his goals. The post is a must-read.

For Charisse

2011-07-25T09:19:00.000-07:00

I am writing this post through tears. I just learned that the world has lost an incredible young woman whom I had the privilege of working with during my tenure at the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Charisse Cecil was the intern I hired all those years ago, and it was her passion for African American culture that really spoke to me. It was her work ethic that impressed me even more. She had the ability to synthesize the multiplicity of ideas running through my mind, and create a cohesive product that hit all the right points.

I was happy to see her join the staff of the National Trust, as a full time employee, and to see her interest in historic preservation, particularly the preservation of African American historic places, grow. We often talked about the links among, history, literature, music and preservation, and how more black folks needed that exposure to see the rich tapestry of our past. In Charisse, I found a kindred spirit, and a good friend. I wanted to see her reach the height of her potential. And I just knew that future generations would one day sit in the classroom of the future Dr. Cecil to learn about African American literature and culture.

It hurts to know that that will not happen now. It hurts to know that I will not be able to catch up with her, when I visit Washington again. It hurts to know that I will never get to know her better. And for all of the hurt that I feel, I cannot imagine what this loss is doing to her family and her closest friends, people that she spoke of so warmly, and with whom she had so much pride.

If only we had more people in this world as open, honest, giving and forthright as Charisse. All of us who had the pleasure and privilege of knowing her will miss that remarkable smile, a smile that could brighten one's spirit the moment she flashed it.

Charisse, you will be missed, but never forgotten. May you rest in peace.

Now Celebrating the Repeal of DADT

2011-07-24T20:27:00.000-07:00

I couldn't quite bring myself to celebrate the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" after the legislation was passed last year. It was a good step forward, but it wasn't complete. People were still caught in the cross hairs of that policy. Only now do I feel really comfortable celebrating the closing of an unfortunate chapter (even though we still have until September 20 before it's wiped from the books) in American history. The certifications necessary have been signed by the Defense Secretary, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the President.

I am particularly happy for my friends (and my cousin) who served our country with pride, in spite of their fears. And I am truly happy for all of those currently serving in our military who can relax, finally. I am sure Leonard Matlovich is smiling down on this one.

Marriage Equality in Action

2011-07-24T20:10:00.000-07:00

I just wanted to add my congratulations to the millions of others from around the country to all of those folks in New York taking advantage of the state's marriage equality. And here is hoping that marriage equality will come to Maryland soon.

A Beautiful Voice Silenced

2011-07-24T20:03:00.000-07:00

When I first got word that Amy Winehouse was dead, I assumed it was a joke, and a weak joke at that. Yet, it was true. I am one of those Winehouse fans who was rooting for her to beat back her demons, and return to the studio. This is an incredible loss.

That voice.

Anyone who had an opportunity to hear Winehouse sing could not deny that the woman had a voice. "Rehab" was my introduction to Winehouse, and it took me a while actually to hear the song. The praise for her voice reached me before I heard the first note, and when I finally heard Winehouse sing, I was hooked. She deserved the accolades.

Even though she is gone, I hope that Amy Winehouse is now, finally, resting in peace.

Prayers for Norway

2011-07-24T19:18:00.000-07:00

I can only imagine the horror the people of Norway are feeling right now. It never would have occurred to me that a place as seemingly safe and tranquil as Norway would ever experience tragedies of such magnitude. I hope that they will come to see this as a true aberration, and not as a symptom of times to come.

The Weekend Retreat is Over, So Back to Posting

2011-07-24T19:07:00.000-07:00

After an essentially news free weekend with old and very good friends, I am just finding out the things that I've missed since Friday morning. Get ready, because I've got a few posts coming.

I Will Miss Cenk on MSNBC

2011-07-21T08:02:00.000-07:00

Folks who read this blog know that I am a big fan of some of the hosts on MSNBC, and I am a HUGE fan of Rachel Maddow. With that said, I was surprised, and glad to see Cenk Uygur from "The Young Turks" grow from being an occasional guest, to getting the 6p spot. As time went on, I found myself making a point to tune in at 6p to see Uygur do his thing. Hell, I even use his line "of cooourse," when I hear news of something typical coming out of Washington. So count me as surprised when a week passed, and Al Sharpton was still filling in for a "vacationing" Uygur. Immediately, I knew something was up. And though I appreciate the occasional Sharpton combativeness (sometimes those black church phrases are just money), he doesn't bring it like Uygur. Sadly, Uygur is gone. But, he did take the time to explain why, and once I heard his reasons, I was glad that he left.

On a final note, it is beyond shady that MSNBC was willing to double Uygur's pay, while keeping him in a reduced role. That sounds like an expensive muzzle.

I Don't Know About Herman

2011-07-19T14:32:00.000-07:00

Some folks might not believe me, but I am glad that Herman Cain is getting traction in his presidential bid. I don't agree with his politics, but I do think that a greater political diversity within the black community is a good thing.

Now with that said, I think that Cain might want to review the Constitution, as it relates to faith. His position that Americans should have the right to ban mosques in their communities might come back to bite his Christianist butt, if he isn't careful. Taken to its logical conclusion, wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that Cain would not be upset if a community decided to ban the building of any church of any faith, including Christian churches? I think we know that answer to that one.

Cain also made it clear that he felt that Mitt Romney would not be able to do well with Republican voters in the South, because Romney is a Mormon. Actually, I agree with the reporter of the linked article that this is something that is whispered in Republican circles; but that isn't showing in the polls so far. It was interesting that there was a comment on Fox where a reporter suggested that Romney isn't a Christian, when comparing Romney to Gov. Rick Perry.

I know one thing: we don't need a "Christianist Warrior" in Chief.

A Welcome Break from the Debt Ceiling Madness

2011-07-19T11:38:00.000-07:00

Because I am disappointed on so many fronts regarding this whole discussion regarding the debt ceiling, I have found myself being drawn in more and more to the incredible events in the UK. I watched the Murdoch hearings, watched the Brooks hearing, and working on a project proposal that's due soon.

Sometimes it's just better to look at another country's mess, than to look at your own.

On Change in the District: Preservation Does Not Have to Be the Enemy

2011-07-18T12:21:00.000-07:00

I am not surprised that Washington is no longer a majority black city any longer. I am also not surprised to read about the same issues related to whites moving in, historic preservation/gentrification, resentments and (on occasion) misunderstandings. And though it might anger some, I think that the changes that have come to Washington have really helped improve much of the city. Though, I agree that Ward 8, particularly, deserves much more attention, and with the current residents, than it has received over the years.

I also agree fully with Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, in that Washington's black community has left an indelible cultural mark on the city, and it is a mark that deserves both preservation and revitalization. I is a real shame that so many black folks in Washington continue to see historic preservation as an updated version of the old "negro removal" from the early and middle 20th century, because it didn't, and still doesn't, have to be that way. There is no rule saying that preservation is available only to whites or to the wealthy.

During my 20+ years in Washington, I was often surprised by the people who did not factor in the lure of Prince George's County, MD for many upwardly mobile black Washington families as the 20th century closed. A few of my relatives headed out there, including relatives who very easily could have remained in the city. I'd suspect that the stereotypical American dream of the suburban home, a nice backyard and garage, once closed to many black families was just too strong to resist, when the opportunities opened. Currently, there are a number of black folks who could afford to move into market rate housing in the city, if they so chose. There are a number of black folks who didn't realize precisely what they had, until it was too late, and there are a number who could not afford to maintain what they had (those are the stories that I find particularly sad). For those in that last circumstance, I would suggest working with every resource in city government to help you keep what you have.

I still want to make a case for historic preservation, even for working class and poorer black communities in the city, because that was raised as a problem specifically. If you see, or hear of, changes coming to your neighborhoods, especially regarding preservation or revitalization efforts, it is beyond important to begin to learn about what is happening around you, and voice, not only your concerns, but also your visions for your communities (the tensions and results described in the H Street Corridor are the types of things that should be happening, because many points of view are being heard). It's all about taking proactive steps and learning how preservation and revitalization can work for you. I can say, without hesitation, that the preservation organizations in Washington want to see working and lower income communities revitalized, particularly for current residents. Reach out to the District's Historic Preservation Office, and the DC Preservation League; these are organization that want and need more input from working class and lower income communities in the city, especially as changes come. They cannot be as effective, if folks wait until it is too late.

I am a firm believer in the importance of individual communities deciding what is important enough in their neighborhoods to preserve for future generations. Historic preservation does not have to mean "gentrification" in a negative sense. It's just a matter of taking those first steps and identifying those businesses, churches or homes of community leaders that neighborhood folks think newcomers and young people should know about. Then it is a matter of reaching out to those organizations that can help communities take the next steps. It won't be easy. Very little that is good for you comes without a struggle. But as Washington diversifies, I hope that many of the remaining black residents will take advantage of the increasing diversity around them. I loved my last neighborhood, Logan Circle, because it had a little bit of everything and everyone.

Regarding Fort Monroe

2011-07-17T23:36:00.000-07:00

When it comes to Fort Monroe, I really don't know where I can begin. The post has been a part of my life for most of my life, whether I was a youngster roaming around Armistead Hall, as my gran cleaned the guest rooms, or as a teenager getting my first "bloody" (by accident) at the Officer's Club during a Sunday brunch, or visiting the Casemate Museum as a Hampton City schools student, or walking along the top of the moat (where the pet cemetary is located, as well as incredible views), or going to the prom at the rooftop ballroom of The Chamberlin (now a Seniors' community), or attending various Easter Sunrise services (including the last one this year) and Hampton Cup Regattas. I don't know how many tennis balls I lobbed into Mill Creek over the years. And there are many other stories I could tell, like many people who have grown up and around this incredible National Historic Landmark.

When I first became involved with the historic preservation movement, I decided that if Fort Monroe ever made the BRAC (Base Re-alignment and Closure) list, then I would do everything in my power to make sure that the National Trust for Historic Preservation would be aware of the post, its history, and its importance to me and the folks in the region. I kept that promise. And I have been particularly happy with the effort to bring a National Park Service unit to Fort Monroe. I will admit that I didn't think that it was possible, considering the incredible back log on the maintenance of the exisiting National Parks (sounds like jobs to me). However, I have to applaud the efforts of Citizens for a Fort Monroe National Park (CFMNP); that organization (along with the Contraband Historical Society) truly helped to push hard for a National Park Service presence on the post. I've also been following the progress of the Fort Monroe Authority, which is the organization managing the post's transition from an active to inactive post.

I was also quite happy to see my former colleagues at the National Trust (particularly Rob Nieweg) really take on the Fort Monroe cause. The organization has a "take action" effort to encourage the Obama administration to designate Fort Monroe a National Monument (please follow this link to learn more). Legislation also has been introduced by Rep. Scott Rigell in the U.S. House to establish a National Park Service unit at Fort Monroe; Senators Webb and Warner have also introduced similar legislation in the U.S. Senate.

Fort Monroe is an incredible historic site, with a history spanning the 17th (at Old Point Comfort) through 21st centuries. It is more than worthy to have a National Park Service Unit. And I highly recommend anyone who reads this blog to take a trip to the post (and don't forget to stop in Phoebus, as well)

Meanwhile, Across the Pond...

2011-07-17T20:39:00.000-07:00

With the exception of an occasional television news report, I've not paid too much attention to the News International hacking scandal in the UK. The scandal has also reached our shores, and I wonder if what has started in the UK will impact Murdoch's interests here in a similarly spectacular fashion (seems like we have a start) Personally, I don't care what happens with Fox. But this story out of the UK is just fascinating and unfortunate.

I've been getting updates from UK sources like BBC News and The Guardian, because somehow I think that the US news sources will somehow miss something. What's making this scandal particularly fascinating is the links to the Metropolitan Police, and even possibly to Prime Minister David Cameron himself. BBC News has a great primer on the principals in this scandal so far, including victims.

It will be interesting to see how this ends.

Mad Props to Michael Irvin

2011-07-12T16:26:00.000-07:00

I just finished reading an article about Michael Irvin, yes, that Michael Irvin, in Out Magazine written by Cyd Zeigler of Outsports. Not only does Irvin discuss his late gay brother, whom he idolized (and kept hidden out of concern for being associated with "gayness"), but he also makes it clear that he is a strong supporter of gay rights generally, and gay athletes particularly. As I read that, I thought about my own teammates on my graduate school flag football team, and how I was accepted as simply a good center (with three intramural championships in four years, by the way); it also made me wish that those guys had been around when I was in high school, but was too afraid to even consider playing football for fear of being found out.

I also think that it is incredibly important for black folks to see someone of Irvin's status talk about a gay family member, and express his desire to see out gay athletes in American sports. We need more allies like him.

UPDATE: Here is a great post on this subject over at Rod 2.0. Enjoy!

Made In China?

2011-07-12T06:35:00.000-07:00

I just stumbled upon an interesting story on Al Jazeera English regarding the new San Francisco Bay Bridge. Though the bridge will be assembled by American workers, the actual development and construction of the bridge was done essentially by Chinese workers.

Though I found the story interesting, I also found it rather sad. Is this the future of our infrastructure projects in the United States?

I Didn't Know My Ancestors Had it So Good

2011-07-08T18:50:00.000-07:00

If one is going to claim that black children were better off in 1860 than in 2011, because they were "more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household," then I need that person to explain precisely what he/she means. That is a claim made by a random Christianist group in Iowa in a pledge regarding heterosexual marriage (among other things, related to marriage and sex), that has been signed by GOP presidential contenders Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum.

Unless I missed something in my academic training in American history, children in slavery could be, and were often, sold away from their parents at the whim of slaveholders. I don't think that "better off" even comes close. That pledge was likely put together in direct response to marriage equality coming to New York, as well as marriage equality in Iowa (and as far as I can tell the state has not descended into Hell fire), so why not just keep to the basic subject of fundamentalist Christianist understandings of marriage and sex (or the lack thereof), instead of wading even more unnecessarily into an area the group clearly knows little about.

The Man Raises Some Very Good Points

2011-07-07T20:08:00.000-07:00

Now, I am not one who generally cites David Frum, but I have to admit that he raised some excellent points regarding President Obama's handling of this entire fiscal madness we are dealing with. Sometimes it's good to be reminded why I don't belong to either party, especially after trying both.

UPDATE: I do often cite Glenn Greenwald over at Salon, and I am about to once again. His assessment of President Obama is ringing true to me as well, and the George Carlin ending is eerily relevant, and in terms of the current kerfuffle around Social Security, prescient.

Maybe I Need a Con Law Refresher...

2011-07-07T19:06:00.000-07:00

..., because if I am reading the U.S Constitution's 14th Amendment correctly, then I would think that President Obama looking to it as a potential remedy for the debt ceiling issue, if Congress fails to act, is a constitutional question, not an impeachable offense. Last time I checked, I don't think looking for a constitutional solution to a federal problem is an example of either treason, bribery or high crimes and/or misdemeanors.

I Think I Might Get Sen. Hatch Now

2011-07-07T18:00:00.000-07:00

Now that it has become a shibboleth on the right that 47%-51% of the population "doesn't pay taxes" (of course all of those non-taxpayers are assumed to be "poor, and none of them pay other types of taxes; here is an interesting table with some preliminary stats for 2011), I think that perhaps Sen. Orrin Hatch's call for "the poor" to do more to shrink the debt and deficit makes more sense to me.

We all know that "the poor" are getting over in this nation, and that this is a great time to be among "the poor," with unemployment benefits, food stamps and such. So why not look to the elimination of Medicaid as a way to have "the poor" pay their fair share. After all, why should we reward those who've made poor choices in their lives? Why should we continue to force the real taxpayers to have their hard earned money go to the most undeserving in the nation, especially when their circumstances are entirely their fault? It only makes sense, unless you are a real fan of Rand, that the real taxpayers' hard earned money should continue to support the various tax breaks and loopholes for those at the top of the economic ladder? I mean once those real taxpayers join the top 1% of income earners, those breaks and loopholes will come in handy.

I mean there is no lobby for the poor, at least not one worth considering. So why not eliminate Medicaid in the effort to help pay down our bills, force the undeserving to do something for themselves, finally? What better way could there be to ensure that "the poor" are contributing sufficiently to this discussion? Though, we might consider getting that small percentage of folks who aren't poor, but also don't "pay taxes" to chip in as well, unless they're rich. After all, they certainly made most of the right choices in life, and deserve our fealty.

It Felt Good to Read Frank Rich Again

2011-07-05T11:02:00.000-07:00

One of my favorite things to do on a Sunday was to check out the latest Frank Rich column in the New York Times, whether online or in print. So, it was a pleasant surprise to find a HuffPo link to a new Rich article for New York magazine. It was made even better by the fact that Rich wrote about President Obama's failure to take on Wall Street, when he had the overwhelming majority of the nation on his side to do so. I agree with Rich that Obama lost the "populist moment" on the American economy. I see it in conjunction with Obama's effort to shield the previous administration from a real investigation on torture. So, before I get too deep into a discussion that only makes me sad and angry, I highly recommend reading the Rich article.

Enjoy!

Then There Are Times When I Don't Know What to Say

2011-07-01T07:46:00.000-07:00

So when that happens, I will rely happily on others to express my feelings on a subject. Please read Glenn Greenwald's post on the Obama administration's successful efforts to provide immunity virtually to everyone related to the subject of torture during the Bush administration.

It Took Folks Long Enough

2011-06-30T11:46:00.000-07:00

Back in May, I wrote a blog post expressing my opinion that the number one goal of the GOP, as articulated by Sen. Mitch McConnell, was to deny President Obama a second term. I also stated that the GOP has reached a point where its members "would be willing to deep-six the nation purely in the hope that the blame will go to President Obama." I still believe that, and it's nice to know that I am not alone in that assessment.

I read with great interest Andrew Sullivan's post entitled "Boehner's Economic Terrorism," because I believe Sullivan is correct on the whole in his analysis of what we are watching, as our nation moves closer to the August 2 deadline regarding the debt ceiling. I now agree with Sullivan that some variation on the Bowles-Simpson plan is what the country needs in order to move toward improving our long-term fiscal outlook. Are there things within that plan that I don't like? Of course, but I also recognize that ours is a nation that has been built on compromises.

I am also glad to hear that a Democratic leader has been willing to suggest this publicly. Sen. Chuck Schumer is the one who has taken this plunge, and I hope that the suggestion leads to substantive questions directed at the GOP congressional leadership (not that we will get substantive answers, but at least the questions will be on the record for public consumption). It will be interesting to see how all of this plays out.

Objectivism in the Words of its Creator

2011-06-28T02:39:00.000-07:00

This post is due completely to my insomnia. I was reading a post over at Think Progress about the president of the Ayn Rand Institute, and as I scrolled down the page I saw a video clip with Rand herself. Before I played the clip on Think Progress, I decided to see what I could find on YouTube. Naturally, I found a three part interview that Mike Wallace conducted with Rand in 1959. Since I hadn't read Atlas Shrugged since high school, I thought it best to listen to all three parts of the interview. I have to admit that it was enlightening, and flashes of what I read started coming back to me. Mind you, it wasn't enlightening in the sense that I agree with Objectivism. I just found it really helpful in understanding, in particular, where Rep. Paul Ryan is coming from, to a degree. Enjoy the interview.

Part I

Part II

Part III

Curbing American Car Usage? We'll Have an Openly Gay Black President First

2011-06-27T15:14:00.000-07:00

There is an effort going on in various cities throughout Europe to discourage the use of cars, in order to help with the environment. Now, since this is a European effort, a solid proportion of the American populace will think that it's akin to something Satan endorsed.
A couple of friends highlighted an interesting article in the New York Times about European efforts to make car usage less attractive than walking or taking mass transit within cities. The article does make it clear that Europe has a better mass transit structure than the U.S., gasoline is around $8 per gallon, and that the cities, of course, are older than cities in the U.S., thus even less car friendly. It's also made clear that many American cities were developed around the use of a car, and not mass transit; Los Angeles is a perfect example.

I've not had a car since the early '90s, nor have I missed it. What I do miss is the lack of a need for a car in Washington, DC. During my time in Washington (14 years), I pretty much had everything that I needed within a five to ten block square. If I needed something outside of my immediate neighborhood, then there was a good mass transit system throughout the region (though with a somewhat limited subway system. Meanwhile, a car is essential in Hampton Roads, and it is one of many things that I find problematic about this region. Hampton Roads is true representation of the car-centric American city/region than a New York City, Chicago or Washington, DC. Add to that the association of the car with individual freedom, and I just cannot see something like the European efforts ever getting a real hearing anywhere in the U.S. (have you heard the derisive commentary about high speed rail, a norm in virtually ever other industrialized nation on the planet?).

But I can always dream, or (eventually, and I hope sooner rather than later) move back to a tradition large U.S. city with density, solid mass transit, and pedestrian friendly amenities. I liked not having to follow the fluctuations of the price of gasoline, or having to pay auto insurance, or maintenance, or parking fees. Regardless, until we actually begin to think that things like climate change are important (or in the cases of some, that it isn't made up), we will not begin to consider genuine solutions. If we reach that point, and I am not so sure we will, at least we will have templates to examine (just don't tell anyone their European).

UPDATE: Over at The Daily Dish, I found an interesting post that included the aforementioned New York Times article. The Dish post has two links (here and here) that suggest that the construction of things like bike lanes and pedestrian friendly infrastructure projects help to create more jobs per million dollars spent than simple road projects.

Better Late Than Never: Stiglitz's Essay on American Income Inequality

2011-06-27T12:04:00.000-07:00

More than a decade ago, my good friend Tiffany reminded me of why I enjoyed reading Vanity Fair. It was (and remains) stylish, informative, and its sensibilities were akin to my own; I am a proud subscriber. I've provided links to a few Vanity Fair articles in my various posts, the most recent being an essay from Christopher Hitchens on our relationship with Pakistan, which I think is a must-read essay). Unfortunately, I forgot to write a post for an essay that appeared in the May 2011 issue that had me spellbound. The economist Joseph Stiglitz's brilliant essay "Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%" is one of the best summations of our economic circumstance that I've read.

I thought of the Stiglitz essay, as I read Sen. Mitch McConnell's op-ed on CNN's website. Not only was it ahistorical in its facts (the last I checked we've been waging two wars off the books until 2009, but that was when VPOTUS Cheney declared, and no Republicans objected, that deficits don't matter), but there was nothing that even pretended to be in the spirit of compromise in the face of real and imminent fiscal dangers. McConnell's job remains twofold. The first is to continue his primary job of getting rid of President Obama, the country be damned, and the second is to serve the interests of the 1%. "Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%" will always be an apt description of all Republican elected officials and most Democratic elected officials.

Read the Stiglitz essay. Though no essay is ever perfect, I think that it would require blind obeisance to "conservative" ideology to dismiss many of the points Stiglitz has raised.

Violence is Just Fine, but Sex is Always Bad

2011-06-27T11:15:00.000-07:00

I've had a long standing complaint with American culture: We LOVE violence. The recent SCOTUS ruling declaring California's attempt to restrict children's access to violent video games unconstitutional is yet one more example of this cultural (in my opinion) problem.

I've said it in this blog before, and I will say it again. I would rather have to explain something sexual that my nephew has been exposed to, than something violent. We have solidified this notion that sexuality altogether is something to be kept in the closet for as long as possible. Yet, when it comes to violence, violent images and the like, we don't even flinch. There is no wonder that we are among the most violent societies on the planet. Most of our most popular television programs require crimes to have been committed in order to maintain the plots. And before cries of hypocrisy come raining down, I am not suggesting banning violent images from children and young people. That would be silly; I love The Lord of the Rings, the Harry Potter books and Looney Toons too much to suggest that.

I just find it totally ironic that many of the complaints about some of the most popular violent video games have everything to do with sexual images, and little to do with the fact that other characters explode in pools of blood in order to advance within a game. I just don't get it. I suppose I never will. But I will say that I hope my nephew becomes someone who will be sexually responsible; and I pray that he will never be forced to use the violence depicted in the video games that exist out there, just for kids.

Really Newt, Really?

2011-06-27T07:45:00.000-07:00

I just finished reading an article over at Talking Points Memo, and Newt Gingrich is talking about how marriage equality show that we are "drifting towards a terrible muddle." I wonder what Newt's first two wives think about his credibility on the subject of marriage.

Marriage Equality is Coming to New York

2011-06-24T20:18:00.000-07:00

This is just incredible! Like millions of folks across the country, I watched and waited to see how the New York Senate vote would unfold. I think it should be noted that the New York Senate is a Republican controlled body, and this measure was able to pass in that chamber. I am also loving the fact that the New York State Senate passed marriage equality, which Governor Cuomo (who showed incredible leadership on getting New York to the finish line) will sign, at the start of New York's Gay Pride weekend. I can only imagine how energized that crowd is going to be this year.

Come on in President Obama; the water is just fine.

Taibbi on Bachmann

2011-06-22T13:42:00.000-07:00

In the post preceding this one, I wrote about the political conservatism that I recognized from my Political Science and History studies over the years. I thought that the type of conservatism described by Andrew Sullivan and Fareed Zakaria could be persuasive to a larger, and possibly more diverse, constituency than it currently enjoys. Even I appreciated some of the ideas expressed in their descriptions.

Now, one of my favorite writers, Matt Taibbi, has written about Rep. Michele Bachmann, and he explains why she needs to be taken seriously (something with which I firmly agree). As I read Taibbi's article, I was reminded of the type of "conservatism" I find repugnant, and Bachmann (as well as Sarah Palin) is a perfect personification of this "conservatism."

Please read the article. Taibbi's closing sentences are particularly illuminating, and sadly, I think he hits the nail right on the head.

In Defense of (c)onservatism

2011-06-16T14:15:00.000-07:00

I've often stated that I am not a conservative, but I've never stated that I couldn't ever become a conservative. After reading two fascinating defenses of conservatism, by Andrew Sullivan and Fareed Zakaria, I have to admit that I fully understood and appreciated what they had to say about conservatism as they understood it, and what "conservatism" has become.

Their explanations of conservatism, invoking political theory and political history, were compelling. I still have some reservations, because believe that we should strive to improve on what we have, and push continually toward that "shining city on a hill" ideal. Conservatism's role seemed, to me, to be about curbing overreach; liberalism's role seemed, to me, to be about pushing boundaries. Both of those perspectives seek the greater good for the nation.

I think that Sullivan's and Zakaria's critiques of "conservatism" are spot on. What I see as "conservatism" in 2011 is nothing like the conservatism they described, and I think that's why I've felt comfortable saying that I am not a "conservative." However, I think I can now say that I am not, and never hope to be a "conservative," but I could see the possibility of embracing aspects of conservatism, as defined by Sullivan and Zakaria. As an historian, I think that it is particularly important to know the past, in order to help inform current decisions. I've argued that President Obama should have spent some time reading the histories of the administrations of both Roosevelts, so that he could see how they approached the pressing issues of their times. Yet, I don't advocate for remaining stuck in the past and never moving on; that's useless.

It's been a long time since I studies political theory and philosophy, but I am glad to get reminders like the two I've linked to in this post. It's good to have one's perspectives and positions challenged and/or refreshed.

Regarding Our Relationship with Pakistan, a Hitchens Must Read

2011-06-15T19:09:00.000-07:00

I have two requests in this post regarding Pakistan, a country of which I know little about historically (hopefully I will be able to see a family friend this summer who is a former Reuters reporter, and who is originally from Pakistan, to answer some of my questions). First, I highly recommend reading the latest column on our troubled relationship with Pakistan by Christopher Hitchens in the latest Vanity Fair, a column I consider a "must-read" in every issue I receive. Finally, I would love to read other columns with supporting or differing points of view on Pakistan.

In light of the latest news of the arrests of Pakistani informants who helped the CIA with intelligence (and many of us are quite glad they did), I think that it's an ideal time for our country to re-examine thoroughly our relationship with Pakistan (and it isn't like some Pakistanis aren't questioning our relationship as well). Clearly, this has begun to happen in Congress, and I think that Defense Secretary Gates' comments to the Senate today were instructive. It will be interesting to see how this will play out.

Regarding Tracy Morgan

2011-06-15T08:28:00.000-07:00

I wasn't sure if I wanted to delve into the mess that comedian Tracy Morgan created, but then I read John McWhorter's thoughts on the subject. Here is the link. I have to say that there is little to improve upon here. McWhorter does an excellent job of encapsulating pretty much all of my feelings on both the Morgan incident, and the issue of homophobia in the Black community. I agree that both the history of Black American subjugation and the history of the Black American church are particularly salient in explaining both the nature and the depth of homophobia here. Misogyny also plays a role.

I've been lucky, in that I lost no friends or family members following my coming out. I also took the step of being out professionally, and I think that because I embraced honesty I've experienced little homophobia, particularly among Black men (though I think my overall size helps a little there too). Now, I have no idea what people say about me after I've left the room, but nothing has ever been said to my face; that's fine with me. I really think that much of this discussion would change if more Black folks simply came out of the closet. It's easy to castigate those you don't know, but when someone is actually in your family or among your friends, it becomes significantly more difficult.

Impartiality Questioned

2011-06-14T13:00:00.000-07:00

A little later today, a judge will rule whether the ruling declaring California's Proposition 8 unconstitutional should be overturned, because the presiding judge is a gay man, and those arguing for the overturning suggest that, as a gay man, he stands to benefit directly from his ruling. In all honesty, I don't know where to begin. There are people I know who see nothing wrong with this line of reasoning. Though, wouldn't that line of reasoning be applicable to heterosexual judges who, presumably, are on the opposite side of that issue? Or are these folks really suggesting that minorities of any stripe are incapable of being impartial judges when confronted with civil rights cases?

UPDATE: Towleroad has reported that the motion to vacate the Prop 8 ruling, because the presiding judge is gay, was denied.

Speaking of Weiner

2011-06-08T14:52:00.000-07:00

I think it was Salon's Glenn Greenwald who talked about all of the pearl clutching that is going on in political media related to the Rep. Anthony Weiner story, and I have to agree that there is a great deal of silly pearl clutching going on indeed. Have you heard Chris Matthews talk about the sitch? You would think that Weiner had been caught in a bestiality scandal, instead of engaging, essentially, in sex chat and picture sharing. It's good to remember that this what Weiner did (unless the ethics probe suggests otherwise) was neither illegal or done on company time. And do we need to open up Pandora's box regarding suggestive conversations that almost anyone in a relationship has over the phone, during work hours or online? I also think Andrew Sullivan's point about "American puritanism" is well taken. Actually, it's tiresome.

I've likely said it on this blog before, so I will say it again: It bothers me that our society is perfectly comfortable with violence and violent depictions in our entertainment, but goes ape shit over sex or sexual images. It's fucking crazy.

With all of that said, it doesn't excuse the stupidity of Weiner. I mean really, dude? And especially after the whole Chris Lee thing, one would think that everyone on the Hill who is getting his/her online groove on would think twice about continuing. Weiner's narcissism and sense of self importance got the best of him, and he is paying the price. And because this is a story that could continue through the summer, I would think that the Democrats would move to have Weiner resign, if only to save themselves from having the narrative move from the attack on Medicare/Medicaid by the GOP to an obsession on Weiner's dick.

What's Next for Weiner?

2011-06-06T13:09:00.000-07:00

It will be interesting if Anthony Weiner will be able to pull a David Vitter or John Ensign, especially following what appears to be more suggestive pictures and texts now out. Like many, I am waiting to hear what he has to say to the media this afternoon (actually within a few minutes from this post). Simple answers tend to help.

UPDATE: Weiner is going to try the Vitter and Ensign route. We'll see how far he goes. Maybe if he is lucky, he can follow in Sen. Vitter's path. And Vitter even got re-elected by the people of Louisiana. At least what he did wasn't illegal, though it is a shame that he decided to lie from the off.

Maybe Kristof Is On To Something

2011-06-05T00:18:00.000-07:00

I just finished reading Nicholas Kristof's column in the New York Times, and I think that he correctly describes the GOP's dream country, though there might be some squabbling over some of the Christianists ideas. Naturally, many in the GOP would disagree, but Kristof's breakdown of how Pakistan is run does seem to align nicely with the policy rhetoric the GOP uses. And I doubt comparing Pakistani systems with GOP dreams will sit well with that lot, so I was glad to see Kristoff include that there are other Asian, Latin American and African models to strive for. Obviously anything is better than looking to Europe for any policy ideas; they're usually just too European, and for the GOP that usually means bad for people, and most importantly bad for business.